Big Dog: Doesn't Understand Why America Does Business with the Saudi Decapitators

Yes, he actually is this stoopid:

I would never let my wife go to one of those filthy places for any reason, business or not.

BD doesn't seem terribly concerned about American female soldiers being stationed in such places! He continues:

First of all I would not want her around all those filthy, smelly, camel jockeys. Second of all I would not take kindly to my wife being treated improperly by these stone aged barbarians. I can’t understand why anyone does business there and certainly cannot understand how people tolerate the backstabbing goat herders they pass off as men.

I guess he forgot - if that's actually possible - that they're the world's largest oil producer and America needs to feed it's oil addiction; therefore we cozy up to fundamentalist monarchs, along with assorted other oil producing dictatorships. I guess Big Dog (who suffers from Clinton Derangement Syndrome and therefore strangely shares the same nickname as Bill Clinton) won't be spurred to actual action and call his representatives demanding the development of alternative sources of energy so that we can stop financing the corrupt Saudi monarchy, which in turn finances the Sunni insurgency in his favorite war. Wait... I know he'll call for drilling in Alaska, which will buy us, oh, 1 year worth of oil maybe. I'm sure he'll also suggest coal plants with voluntary pollution controls - in another community, of course.

But in the end, he's barking at the moon, as usual. He will NEVER address the deep and long-standing business relationships between the Bush family and the Saudi monarchy (and bin Ladens). He won't give up his gas guzzler to stick it to the Saudis. He'll happily give them his money and won't say a word when Bush sells them $20,000,000,000 worth of weapons.

When forced to reconcile his political choices & his lifestyle with the uncomfortable reality that he's funding the decapitators, he'll fall into line and do whatever the hell Bush tells him to do. And he'll be grateful for the disinformation his right wing sources give him.

Big Dog is good sheeple. Racist, too, as the ignorant, sweeping diatribe above demonstrates.

Republican values - do they really want to have this debate?

This video pretty much sums up the values of the Republican leaders and of course the Rudy bit - spoken by his 2nd wife - at the beginning shows you just what a fraud he is.

Oh look... another one.

Will wingnuts ever learn to pay attention to the ACTIONS of their leaders or will they continue to buy into the flag-waving, bible-thumping rhetoric? Seeing as how this has literally been going on for years and there are still a substantial number of wingnuts who are incapable of connecting the dots (or just don't care), my forecast is that they'll continue to get duped - and enjoy it, because that's simply the type of sheeple they are.

Glamour Grandpa Fred Thompson moseys on out of the Republican race; Wins Louisiana hours later (!?)

I imagine he'll resume his long-term career as a lobbyist/Hollyweird actor.

I never understood the enthusiasm amongst so-called conservatives for Thompson. He was transparently lazy & unfit for the job. I think that because he was a self-identified conservative and an actor, conservative morons just lept to the childish conclusion that he was the 2nd coming of Ronald Raygun.

Thompson might have actually had a fighting chance if he would have given his hot 2nd wife a more prominent role in the campaign ;-) His campaign should have also created campaign ads where he pretends to be a President who cross examines 'terrorists' in the kangaroo court at Gitmo. Wingnuts love that sort of razzle-dazzle; that's why they're so easy to dupe.

It could have happened if Thompson was actually capable of having an original thought & wasn't so goddamn lazy.

UPDATE: It seems Thompson would have won the Louisiana delegates hours later if only he knew what the hell was going on. More evidence that he was totally unfit for the job. More evidence that Wingnuts love incompetence as long as the incompetent *sounds* tough & authentic.

Dick Cheney: Sleepy, corrupt old man with a bad ticker

Big Dog, ever the crusader against the evil Clintons, has a post up about Bill Clinton sleeping during Reagan's funeral (Reagan slept thru the criminality of his entire 2nd term) as well as during a service commemorating MLK.

Does Big Dog remember - or care - about Cheney falling asleep on the job pretty constantly? Even during emergency briefings?

I wonder if he's going to get his panties in a bunch about that?

Bush dancing with actual Islamofascist (video); GoOPer indicted for financing Islamic Terrorism

Hi Big Dog (and other delusional, low IQ wingnuts),

See this video of Bush dancing around with the Islamofascist decapitators?

What about the former Republican Congressman - and Reagan Administration appointee - who was indicted for aiding Islamic Terrorists?

Imagine the outcry that would have accompanied these news items if it would have been a Democrat!

Bonus video: Predictably, FOX News didn't find the terrorist financing Republican Congressman's political affiliation worthy of including in their report. FOX News: All Spin, All the Time! FOX News viewers: Gullible naifs who like being duped and lied to!

Big Dog's Jaw-Dropping Stoopidity: Doesn't Know the Difference Between Voter Fraud & Voter Disenfranchisement

In a sea of mediocre, poorly thought out garbage that is found at Big Dog's weblog, his recent post about 'Voter Fraud' stands out as an especially putrid piece of crap.

Big Dog thinks Voter Fraud (pretending to be a legitimate voter when you're not) and Voter Disenfranchisement (removing legitimate voters from the rolls) are the same thing.

And, as usual, Big Dog drops another load of lazy thinking and attempts to pass it off as an attempt at being even handed.

I am not saying that fraud does not exist and I am sure that it happens in both parties.

This 'I'm sure it happens in both parties' type of statement is how he justifies his continued support of GOP fraud & criminality. Naturally, he doesn't supply any evidence to support this sweeping statement, either. He never does.

When the boogeyman of 'Voter Fraud' was raised on his blog previously, I asked him for evidence (before he banned me) and he pointed me to the website for the "American Center for Voting Rights", an organization which existed for approximately 1 year and then fell off the face of the earth forever. And the ACVR was supposed to have volumes of information on alleged Democratic Voter Fraud. Alas, it was nothing more than a GOP front group (with Abramoff connections and everything) and Big Dog got duped, just like he always does. How did little old me find out that they were a bogus front group? Teh Google. Big Dog should try it sometime. It took less than 5 minutes to realize they no longer even had a website. He likes getting duped by his Republican superiors as evidenced by his complete lack of concern when he found out he'd been duped. A normal person would admit such a mistake, as well. Not Big Dog though! He'll never bow down to liberals - let alone the truth! He'll happily pass fake 'news' off onto his unsuspecting readers.

Is he stupid or does he knowingly attempt to pass crap off onto people? Probably both, but I guess we'll never know because he's a cut-and-running fool who is too scared to debate.

Will Big Dog be chastised into actually learning about his topic before writing about it? That's probably unlikely, too.

Big Dog acknowledges occasional American 'not nice' deeds

I wonder if he has the balls to tell us which 'not nice' deeds he's referring to? I'm not holding my breath because then he'd actually be required to confront some uncomfortable historical truths which is something that childish wingnuts simply cannot allow themselves to do. When such situations arise, the wingnut response is to cut-and-run by jamming their fingers in their ears and screaming at the top of their lungs. That or simply try to sweep it under the rug by feigning ignorance.

Big Dog's quote from a meandering post about Ron Paul:

"I have a hard time taking his blame America for everything position. Yes, we as a country have done some things that are not nice. But we are not to blame for all the world's woes."

My comment to him, which I'm almost postive he won't publish because he's a control freak who's afraid of being shown up on his blog:

So in other words, you're acknowledging that America has done some bad things that might cause others to get upset with us. Wow... an honest statement! By extension, don't you think it's common sense that if some people are upset enough, they may try to attack us? I know you feel most comfortable debating straw men, but I'm not aware of anyone (even Paul) who said America is 'to blame for ALL THE WORLD'S WOES [emphasis mine]'.